| Current Path : /home/ift/mails/37/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //home/ift/mails/37/1541253009.zrspam.376437_2018_11_03 |
From 10106-8020-519723-2719-christian.gabriel=ift-informatik.de@mail.scrbrr.us Sat Nov 3 14:50:09 2018
Return-Path: <10106-8020-519723-2719-christian.gabriel=ift-informatik.de@mail.scrbrr.us>
X-Original-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id 907B53D2000A2; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 14:50:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Sat, 03 Nov 2018 14:50:09 +0100
From: "6 Critical Tools In One Tiny Box" <assist@scrbrr.us>
To: <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>
Subject: *****SPAM***** F.R.E.E_SOS-Pocket Survival Kit Today !
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 14:49:54 +0100
Message-Id: <v8m3kcz01y2nre36-1dfl4lg2pd6cll30-1f54-7ee2b@scrbrr.us>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *******
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,GAPPY_SUBJECT,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RDNS_NONE,
URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_5BDDA791.F8E1E6C1"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_5BDDA791.F8E1E6C1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: F.R.E.E_SOS-Pocket Survival Kit Today ! http://scrbrr.us/clk.2_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_32219465
http://scrbrr.us/clk.20_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_d2a9443f The term
"instinct" in psychology was first used in the 1870s by Wilhelm Wundt. By
the close of the 19th century, most repeated behavior was considered instinctual.
In a survey of the literature at that time, one researcher chronicled 4,000
human "instincts," having applied this label to any behavior that was repetitive.[citation
needed] As research became more rigorous and terms better defined, instinct
as an explanation for human behavior became less common. In a conference
in 1960, chaired by Frank Beach, a pioneer in comparative psychology, and
attended by luminaries in the field, the term was restricted in its application.[citation
needed] During the 1960s and 1970s, textbooks still contained some discussion
of instincts in reference to human behavior. By the year 2000, a survey of
the 12 best selling textbooks in Introductory Psychology revealed only one
reference to instincts, and that was in regard to Sigmund Freud's referral
to the "id" instincts.[citation needed]. In this sense, instincts appeared
to have become regarded as increasingly superfluous in trying to understand
human psychological behavior. [...]
Content analysis details: (7.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: scrbrr.us]
1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist
[URIs: scrbrr.us]
1.7 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains an URL listed in the DBL blocklist
[URIs: scrbrr.us]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to
background
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
2.0 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_5BDDA791.F8E1E6C1
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from cape.scrbrr.us (unknown [185.136.207.38])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65BC3D200075
for <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 14:50:06 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=scrbrr.us;
h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=assist@scrbrr.us;
bh=lFOBxCY0F9S3N4XO1NeRilW1FPk=;
b=ezGSJO7Ymzfmkpw90cycl15b9plTKqy/asoD6Rl6npj4uuQJr7Sbvf3QHd1DuazcfGyR1rLvBY39
VWATYuT0uV9rwgDudKKEOkAt16SM1FFze91wK7zCSEHCBwN83YdFjgKTg0egkt8QGyLEwDenkA2w
2/MGDVHifwECygaZdhM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=scrbrr.us;
b=jR8RGyGEoPTUBC+reQ4HsRJKiWfeV/xxb7Gg/WzgldvXW7Rk7dESh+G3kBb2LBi+UtQy2Omzve7h
K4qe4xEz5/QQqsblyx7lWlq0vI8ujXUKCm27EA0zrT1jAvhPKp8jJl8WlFdDfBpHNhiKL+jzDG0T
VZXzfRVoHudryndMvz8=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b78a08a8cc68f5dccace921794a17f37_1f54_7ee2b"
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 14:49:54 +0100
From: "6 Critical Tools In One Tiny Box" <assist@scrbrr.us>
Reply-To: "6 Critical Tools In One Tiny Box" <correspondence@scrbrr.us>
Subject: F.R.E.E_SOS-Pocket Survival Kit Today !
To: <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>
Message-ID: <v8m3kcz01y2nre36-1dfl4lg2pd6cll30-1f54-7ee2b@scrbrr.us>
--b78a08a8cc68f5dccace921794a17f37_1f54_7ee2b
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
F.R.E.E_SOS-Pocket Survival Kit Today !
http://scrbrr.us/clk.2_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_32219465
http://scrbrr.us/clk.20_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_d2a9443f
The term "instinct" in psychology was first used in the 1870s by Wilhelm Wundt. By the close of the 19th century, most repeated behavior was considered instinctual. In a survey of the literature at that time, one researcher chronicled 4,000 human "instincts," having applied this label to any behavior that was repetitive.[citation needed] As research became more rigorous and terms better defined, instinct as an explanation for human behavior became less common. In a conference in 1960, chaired by Frank Beach, a pioneer in comparative psychology, and attended by luminaries in the field, the term was restricted in its application.[citation needed] During the 1960s and 1970s, textbooks still contained some discussion of instincts in reference to human behavior. By the year 2000, a survey of the 12 best selling textbooks in Introductory Psychology revealed only one reference to instincts, and that was in regard to Sigmund Freud's referral to the "id" instincts.[citation needed]. In this sense, instincts appeared to have become regarded as increasingly superfluous in trying to understand human psychological behavior.
Psychologist Abraham Maslow argued that humans no longer have instincts because we have the ability to override them in certain situations. He felt that what is called instinct is often imprecisely defined, and really amounts to strong drives. For Maslow, an instinct is something which cannot be overridden, and therefore while the term may have applied to humans in the past, it no longer does.
The book Instinct (1961) established a number of criteria which distinguish instinctual from other kinds of behavior. To be considered instinctual, a behavior must: a) be automatic, b) be irresistible, c) occur at some point in development, d) be triggered by some event in the environment, e) occur in every member of the species, f) be unmodifiable, and g) govern behavior for which the organism needs no training (although the organism may profit from experience and to that degree the behavior is modifiable).
In a classic paper published in 1972, the psychologist Richard Herrnstein decries Fabre's opinions on instinct (see: In biology section).
--b78a08a8cc68f5dccace921794a17f37_1f54_7ee2b
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://scrbrr.us/clk.0_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_6fc97504"><img src="http://scrbrr.us/53d095d3e7687ecf55.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.scrbrr.us/clk.14_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_38b0fb35" width="1" /></a><br />
<center>
<table align="">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table align="center" style="border:5px solid #1D78DC; padding:6px;width:600px;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" style="font-size:18px"><u><strong><a href="http://scrbrr.us/clk.2_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_32219465" style="text-decoration:none;font-family:comic sans ms;font-size:25px;color:red;"><span style="color:#B22222;">>>Can I Rush Ship You A FREE SOS Pocket Survival Kit Today? </span></a></strong></u><br />
<br />
6 Critical Tools In One Tiny Box, <strong>EVERYTHING YOU'LL NEED TO HANDLE JUST ABOUT <a href="http://scrbrr.us/clk.2_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_32219465" style="color:#ff0000;"><span style="color:#ff0000;">ANY SITUATION</span></a></strong><br />
<center><a href="http://scrbrr.us/clk.2_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_32219465"><img alt=" " src="http://scrbrr.us/e5a1f7899a791591ca.jpg" /></a></center>
<div style="text-align:center;width:600px;"><a href="http://scrbrr.us/clk.2_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_32219465" style="font-size:16px;color:#283B42;text-decoration:none;background-color:#FBE297;padding:8px;border-bottom:solid 8px #C7A83D;border-top:#C7A83D 8px solid;border-left:solid 10px #283B42;border-right:solid 10px #283B42;text-shadow:3px 3px 3px #FF8080;"><strong style="font-family:comic sans ms;padding:1px;"><b>Please Rush My FREE SOS Pocket Survival Kit To My Doorstep Today</b></strong></a></div>
<center><a href="http://scrbrr.us/clk.2_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_32219465"><img alt=" " src="http://scrbrr.us/cedb0dd567f80fbc3b.jpg" /></a></center>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://scrbrr.us/clk.12_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_6500bd36"><img alt=" " src="http://scrbrr.us/29ea0e83a0a2a6aa94.jpg" /></a></center>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table align="center" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="font-size:6px;color:#FFFFFF">The term "instinct" in psychology was first used in the 1870s by Wilhelm Wundt. By the close of the 19th century, most repeated behavior was considered instinctual. In a survey of the literature at that time, one researcher chronicled 4,000 human "instincts," having applied this label to any behavior that was repetitive.[citation needed] As research became more rigorous and terms better defined, instinct as an explanation for human behavior became less common. In a conference in 1960, chaired by Frank Beach, a pioneer in comparative psychology, and attended by luminaries in the field, the term was restricted in its application.[citation needed] During the 1960s and 1970s, textbooks still contained some discussion of instincts in reference to human behavior. By the year 2000, a survey of the 12 best selling textbooks in Introductory Psychology revealed only<a href="http://scrbrr.us/clk.0_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_6fc97504"><img src="http://scrbrr.us/53d095d3e7687ecf55.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.scrbrr.us/clk.14_10106_8020_519723_2719_5139_0300_38b0fb35" width="1" /></a> one reference to instincts, and that was in regard to Sigmund Freud's referral to the "id" instincts.[citation needed]. In this sense, instincts appeared to have become regarded as increasingly superfluous in trying to understand human psychological behavior. Psychologist Abraham Maslow argued that humans no longer have instincts because we have the ability to override them in certain situations. He felt that what is called instinct is often imprecisely defined, and really amounts to strong drives. For Maslow, an instinct is something which cannot be overridden, and therefore while the term may have applied to humans in the past, it no longer does. The book Instinct (1961) established a number of criteria which distinguish instinctual from other kinds of behavior. To be considered instinctual, a behavior must: a) be automatic, b) be irresistible, c) occur at some point in development, d) be triggered by some event in the environment, e) occur in every member of the species, f) be unmodifiable, and g) govern behavior for which the organism needs no training (although the organism may profit from experience and to that degree the behavior is modifiable). In a classic paper published in 1972, the psychologist Richard Herrnstein decries Fabre's opinions on instinct (see: In biology section).</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</center>
</body>
</html>
--b78a08a8cc68f5dccace921794a17f37_1f54_7ee2b--
------------=_5BDDA791.F8E1E6C1--