
| Current Path : /home/ift/mails/14/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //home/ift/mails/14/1478956294.zrspam.145919_2016_11_12 |
From ugzqqutbjhd@fbcom.net Sat Nov 12 14:11:34 2016
Return-Path: <ugzqqutbjhd@fbcom.net>
X-Original-To: tjungblut@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: tjungblut@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id 660EE37525452; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:11:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:11:34 +0100
From: "Rhea Soto" <Soto_Tammi@estacionjujuy.22n.com>
To: tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de
Subject: *****SPAM***** 1 InstaF*ck Request is Pending
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:05:31 +0500
Message-Id: <8851397853-YJAPZRYTXMFABJUDVXANK@efdia17.estacionjujuy.22n.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *****************************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=29.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,
FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
PYZOR_CHECK,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,
RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_PSBL,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,RCVD_IN_XBL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,TVD_RCVD_IP,
TVD_RCVD_IP4 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_58271506.3E06CA7B"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_58271506.3E06CA7B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: when do u want to h00kup? i'm h0rny and available right now.
do u want to c0me over? i can h0st. i will be the best f*ck u have ever had!
want to see my ph0tos? you can *check them out here* [...]
Content analysis details: (29.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
[85.29.156.182 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server
[85.29.156.182 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP4 No description available.
0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP No description available.
2.4 RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH Received: HELO and IP do not match, but should
1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO
0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[85.29.156.182 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[85.29.156.182 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?85.29.156.182>]
2.4 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 RBL: Very bad reputation (-5)
[85.29.156.182 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available.
[85.29.156.182 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
1.4 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
0.3 DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check
1.5 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 No description available.
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_58271506.3E06CA7B
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from 85.214.156.58 (unknown [85.29.156.182])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with SMTP id B159137525451
for <tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:11:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <8851397853-YJAPZRYTXMFABJUDVXANK@efdia17.estacionjujuy.22n.com>
From: "Rhea Soto" <Soto_Tammi@estacionjujuy.22n.com>
Subject: 1 InstaF*ck Request is Pending
To: tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:05:31 +0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
when do u want to h00kup? i'm h0rny and available right now. do u want to c0me over? i can h0st. i will be the best f*ck u have ever had! want to see my ph0tos? you can <a href="http://sexy-dream7.top/?u=79h8kwf&o=epgkvze&t=">*check them out here*</a>
------------=_58271506.3E06CA7B--